This year was the 25th anniversary of The Sopranos. You may have noticed renewed interest in the series, or at least the Instagram trend of the “#mobwife” aesthetic. Creator of the acclaimed show, David Chase, in an interview earlier this year stated “It [TV programs] is getting worse.” This is a valid argument from a man with 7 primetime Emmys and a litany of other creative awards andnominations. Keep in mind also, the big competition for most of the duration of The Sopranos was The West Wing. If you don’t think those two shows going head to head was the epitome of “prestige TV” you’re crazy. There is of course, still prestige television- we need only look to The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, Game of Thrones, Stranger Things, True Detective, White Lotus, Succession, and The Bear….but the seasons are shorter, ALL of the aforementioned shows “air” on paid streaming services, and; as evidenced by the strikes this past summer, the creatives and laborers who work on these shows are often not being paid enough to earn a living. There is a post that has been circulating that I have reposted multiple times, I’m not sure of the original author but the sentiment is this: AI sounds great, because we should be using it for laundry, and the dishes, and housework, and helping to organize our taxes so that we can be free to have time to do art and writing. AI shouldn’t be used for the creative, it should be used for the banal. Humans want to create, we shouldn’t be using AI to take away from human nature, we should be using it to enhance our time and ability to enjoy our artistic pursuits be they our driving force or a hobby. Though the WGA and SAG strikes ended, this fight at large is still not over….and we are now starting to see how the behavior of the types of people who are in charge of movie studios, is impacting all areas of our economic and social lives.
This week the House Judiciary Committee will be holding hearings aimed, in no small part, at keeping the free press...free. Veteran journalist Catherine Herridge will be testifying about her dismissal (along with about 800 employees by Paramount) from CBS news and the subsequent holding hostage of her personal files by CBS News. CBS loves to air congressional hearings live- but I’m guessing this is one they’ll skip. Paramount, the parent company of CBS News has according to some articles in recent months “fallen” on hard times, but really Paramount has brought this all upon itself. If you’ll recall the numerous articles about the behavior and poor decisions made by previous President of CBS news Neeraj Khemlani (stranding people in Afghanistan after the US troop withdrawal, general bad behavior requiring the company to give him a personal HR rep to essentialy tail him around and make sure he spoke to people as if they were…people). And he came after a long line of faliures including several situations regarding the "bad men in media" like Charlie Rose and Les Moonves.
These companies, like Nike and Boeing and Warner Discovery and Netflix during the summer strikes have all brought their poor falling stock prices upon themselves, but the employees and consumers are the ones paying the price. Paramount, much like the rest of these companies has put people in charge who have no familiarity with the product the company creates, these people do not have experience in making media, or journalism, or airplanes, or athletic apparel, they are all hired because they are “financey” but it has become very clear, at least to me, over the last 12 months, that none of these people are even good at finance! If they were, they wouldn’t be making these monumental mistakes, or at the very least they would be learning from them. Despite all their stock buybacks these companies have largely falling stock prices, are laying off employees, and all seem to have the audacity to blame the American consumer.
People want to buy clothing that is ethically created, up to the standards that the price dictates, and is the correct color, when supporting their team. People want to see more than one aerospace company in operation so that they can make a choice when deciding what to fly, people want to be able to trust the news- but find it very hard to do so because of the parent companies acting as cronies to the government, they want to be entertained by creators not by robots or the uber rich who are out of touch with reality, and they want to be able to earn a living, support their families, and enjoy their own hobbies all without fearing that if they say the wrong thing to their employer they’ll be fired, or worse killed.
Many people will claim this all has to do with late stage capitalism. I don’t buy that argument, specifically when it comes to Boeing. If this were truly a capitalist society Boeing would have gone out of business as soon as the Lion Air 610 fell out of the sky. They didn’t simply because there are basically two commercial aerospace companies in the world, Boeing and Airbus. Airbus being French (and not without its own issues) is not heavily used in the United States and thus Boeing, much like the car companies and banks before it, was “too big to fail.” That’s not capitalism, that’s cronyism. With capitalism Nike would be competing constantly with other athletic wear manufacturers to keep their contracts with sports leagues, not colluding with other companies to keep the contracts in house. ESPN, Fox and Warner shouldn’t be able to collude for sports streaming rights in a fairly blatant violation of anti-trust laws, the 3 network news outlets, who broadcast FOR FREE on public airwaves should be competing for stories, sports contracts, interviews, etc.
Photo by Juliana Romão on Unsplash